Legal Opinion

United States Rubber Company v. Francis Wright

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided May 25, 1966No. 20236_1PublishedCited by 120 opinions

1Per curiam

By order dated July 26, 1965, this court granted an interlocutory appeal under 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) from an order of the district court denying appellant’s motion for summary judgment and from the district court’s subsequent narrative order denying reconsideration of its prior order. In the latter order the district court noted that its ruling “involved a controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion and that an immediate appeal from said orders may materially advance the ultimate termination of this litigation.” After receiving briefs and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Molybdenum Corporation of America v. J. Bryant Kasey, Maryann Kasey and Julius A. PaskanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

3Cited by120 opinions

  1. James R. Ahrenholz, Plaintiff-Appellee/respondent v. Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois, Defendant-Appellant/petitionerCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2000
  2. In Re Cement Antitrust Litigation (Mdl No. 296). State of Arizona v. Ideal Basic Industries, State of Arizona v. United States District Court for the District of Arizona, and Kaiser Cement and Gypsum Corporation, Real Parties in Interest. State of Arizona v. Ash Grove Cement CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
  3. Union County, Iowa v. Piper Jaffray & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  4. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Thomas Solvent Co.District Court, W.D. Michigan · 1988
  5. In Re Pyramid Co. of BurlingtonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982

115 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API