Legal Opinion

In Re Pyramid Co. of Burlington

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided June 8, 1982No. 125-81PublishedCited by 68 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHill, J.

This case concerns an application for a land development permit under Act 250, 10 V.S.A., ch. 151. The Pyramid Company (Pyramid) appealed from a decision of the district environmental commission denying its permit application for a shopping mall in the Town of Williston. Pyramid then appealed to the Chittenden Superior Court under 10 V.S.A. § 6089(a). The matter is now before this Court pursuant to the superior court’s order certifying an interlocutory appeal under V.E.A.P. 5 (b). We hold that the trial court incorrectly granted permission for an interlocutory appeal, and therefore dismiss…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Reuben J. Katz, on Behalf of Himself and All Others Similarly Situated v. Carte Blanche CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1974
  2. Kennedy v. Silas Mason Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. United States Rubber Company v. Francis WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966
  4. James Harvey Johnson v. Warden Noah Alldredge and Corrections Officer CronrathCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1973
  5. Gweldon Lee Paschall v. Kansas City Star Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by68 opinions

  1. State v. BadgerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1982
  2. Murray v. WhiteSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  3. Morrisville Lumber Co., Inc. v. OkcuogluSupreme Court of Vermont · 1987
  4. Clymer v. WebsterSupreme Court of Vermont · 1991
  5. Emme v. C.O.M.B., Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1988

63 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API