Legal Opinion

Milwaukee County v. Schmidt, Garden & Erikson

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided May 9, 1967PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHansen, J.

The issue raised in this appeal is: Does the service of a summons without a copy of the verified complaint on a nonresident when followed by defendant’s letter demanding a copy of the complaint and the subsequent service thereof, pursuant to such demand, confer personal jurisdiction over the defendant?

Sec. 262.12, Stats., provides as follows:

“262.12 Summons, what must accompany when served. (1) Personal Jurisdiction . . .
“ (b) When personal service is made without this state upon the defendant, a copy of the verified complaint shall accompany the summons.”
“262.16 Raising objection to personal…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Mullane v. Central Hanover Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1950
  2. Mohr v. ManierreSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  3. Huck v. Chicago, St. Paul, Minneapolis & Omaha Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Hammond-Chandler Lumber Co. v. Industrial CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Stewart v. Transcontinental Car Forwarding Co.New York Supreme Court · 1938

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Hansher v. KaishianWisconsin Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Schlumpf v. YellickWisconsin Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Hasley v. Black, Sivalls & Bryson, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Heaston v. AustinWisconsin Supreme Court · 1970
  5. Lees v. Department of Industry, Labor & Human RelationsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API