Batchelor v. Mandigo
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtWhite, P. J.
Plaintiffs brought an action to recover treble damages under the Usury Law of this state (Stats. 1919, p. lxxxiii; 2 Deering’s Gen. Laws, Act. 3757; Cal. Const., art. XX, § 22), alleging that within one year defendant had taken and received from them interest of $4,801.31 on a loan of $15,000. The trial court, hearing the case without a jury, found that the transaction was not usurious, and judgment was entered that plaintiffs take nothing. Plaintiffs appeal from the judgment and from an order denying their motion to vacate the judgment and enter another and different judgment.
Plaintiffs…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Milana v. Credit Discount Co.California Supreme Court · 1945
- Eames v. HardinIllinois Supreme Court · 1884
- Stark v. Bauer Cooperage Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1925
- Austermuhl v. WottonWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Powers v. WalrathAppellate Court of Illinois · 1924
3Cited by15 opinions
- Burr v. Capital Reserve Corp.California Supreme Court · 1969
- Meridian Bowling Lanes, Inc. v. BrownIdaho Supreme Court · 1966
- Janisse v. Winston Investment Co.California Court of Appeal · 1957
- Wilcox v. MooreMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
- Martin v. Ajax Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1954
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.