Legal Opinion

Eames v. Hardin

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1884PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Appellate Court for the First District; — ■ heard in that court on appeal from the Superior Court of Cook county; the Hon. John A. Jameson, Judge, presiding. This was a suit in chancery instituted by Isaac N. Hardin and others, against Henry F. Fames and Jesse Spaulding, to redeem certain premises under a transaction claimed to be a loan and mortgage.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Craig

The decision of this ease may be turned alone on the question whether this was a purchase by appellants of the seven lots, and a sale thereof to Hardin, or was the money advanced to Hardin as a loan, and the purchase of the lots to be held by appellants as a pledge, or as security for the payment of the money.

The entire transaction has every form of a purchase and sale. These seven lots, with three others, had been sold under a decree of foreclosure of a mortgage, and the time for redemption from the sale was near expiring, when Hardin applied for the loan. Hardin says, in his .testimony,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Magnusson v. JohnsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1874

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Jasper v. HazenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1894
  2. Burgett v. OsborneIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  3. Dodd v. RottermanIllinois Supreme Court · 1928
  4. Batchelor v. MandigoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1950
  5. McDonnell v. HoldenIllinois Supreme Court · 1933

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API