Legal Opinion
United States Ex Rel. Tietz v. Secretary of the Navy
District Court, S.D. California
Decided October 23, 1957No. 2071PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMES M. CARTER, District Judge.
Petitioner having filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus, injunction, mandamus and declaratory relief on September 20, 1957, and this Court having on the same day issued its order to the respondent to show cause why any or all of said writs or relief should not issue or should not be granted as the case may be, the respondent thereafter appearing for himself and for no other person, made his return to said petition. The parties thereafter appearing in open Court on September 30, 1957, before the Honorable James M. Carter, United States District Judge,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- McNally v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Dickinson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Witmer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1955
- In Re GrimleySupreme Court of the United States · 1890
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hammond v. LenfestCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1968
- United States v. NoydUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1969
- Crane v. HedrickDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1968
- Brown v. McNamaraDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1967
- Noyd v. McNamaraDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1967
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.