Legal Opinion

Vulcanite Portland Cement Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided April 6, 1931No. H-259PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGreen, Judge

Plaintiff brings this suit to recover $6,530.51 balances unpaid the plaintiff for cement delivered to the Government pursuant to two written contracts. The defendant sets up certain counterclaims, which will hereinafter be set forth, based upon alleged overpayments to the plaintiff upon other contracts. There is no dispute about the amount unpaid under the two contracts upon which plaintiff brings suit. The controversy in the case is wholly with relation to the counterclaims set up by the defendant. All of these counterclaims pertain to contracts made by plaintiff for the delivery of cement…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wisconsin Central Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  2. Alaska Packers' Ass'n v. DomenicoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
  3. Standard Dredging Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1930
  4. Endel v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  5. J. J. Preis & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1923

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Aviation Contractor Employees, Inc. v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
  2. Alaska American Lumber Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1992
  3. Green Management Corp. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1998
  4. Montefiore Hospital Ass'n v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1984
  5. Thomas Creek Lumber & Log Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1996

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API