Legal Opinion

Standard Dredging Co. v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided December 1, 1930No. D-40PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLittleton, Judge

The defendant at the outset contends that this court has no jurisdiction to determine the issues of this case for the reason that plaintiff has failed to meet the requirements of section 180 of the Judicial Code, 36 Stat. 1141, under which one of its claims is made; that in bringing this suit in its own behalf, the plaintiff must allege and admit that it is or has been indebted to the United States as an officer or agent thereof or by virtue of a contract therewith, failing in which *238it lias failed' to state a cause of action within the jurisdiction of this court.

There is no merit in this…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. United States v. O'GradySupreme Court of the United States · 1875
  2. United States v. Burton Coal Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
  3. King v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1902
  4. Burton Coal Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1925
  5. Hobbs v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1884

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. New York Shipbuilding Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  2. CLIMATIC RAINWEAR, CO. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1950
  3. Vulcanite Portland Cement Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1931
  4. Helvetia Milk Condensing Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1932
  5. Aluminum Co. of America v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1938

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API