Legal Opinion

Dunlavy v. Dairyland Mutual Insurance

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 29, 1963PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCurrie, J.

After reviewing the record in this appeal we reach these conclusions :(1) The movants for new trial, with respect to the negligence issues, failed to fully comply with that part of sec. 270.50, Stats., which provides, “A motion for a new trial founded upon newly discovered evidence may be heard upon afjidavits and the papers in the action.” (Italics supplied.)(2) There was no such failure to comply with such statutory requirement with respect to granting a new trial on the insurance coverage issues.(3) This court on its own motion should grant a new trial in the interest of justice pursuant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Keeley v. Great Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Teasdale v. TeasdaleWisconsin Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Beck v. WallmowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  4. Loucheine v. StrouseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  5. Mickoleski v. BeckerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. State v. McCallumWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Savina v. Wisconsin Gas Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  3. State v. KiviojaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Estate of JavornikWisconsin Supreme Court · 1967
  5. State v. David McAlister, Sr.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 2018

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API