Legal Opinion

Mickoleski v. Becker

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided February 17, 1948PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, J.

The alleged newly discovered evidence; upon which defendant bases his motion for a new trial, would be material in the event of such trial on solely the issue as to whether plaintiff was so badly injured and disabled as the result of being assaulted and beaten by defendant on June 4, 1946, that he cannot run or even walk without a cane. On the first trial in June, 1947, plaintiff testified (briefly summarized) that as the result of the assault he was all banged up and stiff and sore; that every time he.twists his neck and shoulders it feels like sharp needles going through there all the way…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Keeley v. Great Northern Railway Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Beck v. WallmowWisconsin Supreme Court · 1938
  3. Loucheine v. StrouseWisconsin Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Jalie v. CardinalWisconsin Supreme Court · 1874
  5. Miller Saw-Trimmer Co. v. CheshireWisconsin Supreme Court · 1922

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Estate of EannelliWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  2. Gehner v. McPhersonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. Dunlavy v. Dairyland Mutual InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  4. Dabareiner v. WeisflogWisconsin Supreme Court · 1948
  5. Naden v. JohnsonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1973

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API