Legal Opinion
Hough Transit, Ltd. v. National Farmers Organization
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 25, 1991No. C1-90-2700PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SHORT, Judge.
On appeal from a grant of summary judgment, Hough Transit, Ltd. argues the trial court erred as a matter of law in concluding (1) the exclusive dealing agreement between National Farmers Organization and Wilke did not violate state antitrust law and (2) its claim for tortious interference with a prospective business advantage was meritless. We disagree and affirm.
FACTS
Hough Transit, Ltd. is a trucking service which is in the business of hauling milk from farmer-producers to various creameries. Respondent National Farmers Organization is a cooperative consisting of…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Northern Pacific Railway Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Continental T. v. Inc. v. GTE Sylvania Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Board of Trade of Chicago v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
- National Society of Professional Engineers v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bloom v. Hennepin CountyDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1992
- Overka v. American Airlines, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2010
- H Enterprises International, Inc. v. General Electric Capital Corp.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1993
- Coyne's & Co., Inc. v. ENESCO, LLCDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2008
- Gieseke ex rel. Diversified Water Diversion, Inc. v. IDCA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2013