Legal Opinion

Coleman v. City of Richmond

Court of Appeals of Virginia

Decided January 19, 1988No. Record No. 0646-86-2PublishedCited by 51 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

COLEMAN, J.

A Richmond ordinance prohibits loitering in a public place “under circumstances manifesting the purpose of engaging in prostitution.” Curtis Coleman appeals his conviction under that ordinance and argues that the statute is overbroad, un constitutionally vague, and violative of his fifth amendment rights. He also argues that even if the ordinance is constitutional, the evidence was insufficient to support the conviction.

Two detectives from the Vice Division of the Richmond Police Department testified that they were conducting a surveillance on November 9, 1985, at Madison…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Broadrick v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Papachristou v. City of JacksonvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  4. City of Houston v. HillSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Gooding v. WilsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by51 opinions

  1. City of Tacoma v. LuveneWashington Supreme Court · 1992
  2. City of Akron v. RowlandOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Silvar v. Eighth Judicial District Court of the State of Nevada ex rel. County of ClarkNevada Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Jackson v. W.Court of Appeals of Virginia · 1992
  5. Wyche v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1993

46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API