Legal Opinion

City of Akron v. Rowland

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided September 22, 1993No. 92-1120PublishedCited by 71 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWright, J.

I

A. History of Loitering Laws

Loitering and vagrancy laws have a long and troubling history in Anglo-American jurisprudence. Vagrancy laws existed in England as early as the seventh century in the form of “poor laws.” See Comment, The Third Generation of Loitering Laws Goes to Court: Do Laws That Criminalize “Loitering with the Intent to Sell Drugs” Pass Constitutional Muster? (1993), 71 N.C.L.Rev. 513, 515. Poor laws were instituted for economic reasons: they criminalized the status of unemployment in an attempt to ensure that peasant-class laborers would be unable to leave the employ of…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Terry v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
  2. Grayned v. City of RockfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Connally v. General Construction Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  4. Kolender v. LawsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. National Ass'n for the Advancement of Colored People v. ButtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1963

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by71 opinions

  1. State v. McKnightOhio Supreme Court · 2005
  2. State v. GardnerOhio Supreme Court · 2008
  3. State ex rel. Pirman v. MoneyOhio Supreme Court · 1994
  4. State v. BurnettOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  5. City of Cleveland v. TrzebuckowskiOhio Supreme Court · 1999

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API