Legal Opinion

McNeil v. Dow

California Court of Appeal

Decided December 28, 1948No. Civ. 16521PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtYork, P. J.

This is an appeal by the defendant, as administratrix of the estate of Alice Maud Dayton, deceased, from a judgment in favor of plaintiffs in an action to quiet title and declare a trust in respect to a parcel of realty, and directing said administratrix to execute and deliver to plaintiffs a deed to an undivided one-half interest therein.

The amended complaint alleges three causes of action, to wit: 1. That on October 21, 1935, the then owners conveyed the realty here in controversy, “the title showing of record a one-half interest therein to plaintiffs, as joint tenants, and an undivided…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Bank of California v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Lathrop v. BamptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1866
  3. Lezinsky v. Mason Malt Whiskey Distilling Co.California Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Murphy v. ClaytonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Rundell v. McDonaldCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Meyer v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1954
  2. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. v. PorterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  3. In Re RogalDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1953
  4. Cornitius v. CornitiusCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957
  5. Condaffer v. HoskinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1957

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API