Legal Opinion
Quaschnick v. Minnesota
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided July 18, 1985No. Civ. No. 4-84-768PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
DIANA E. MURPHY, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Terry Quaschnick, brought this action for damages against defendants, the state of Minnesota, Robert Borner, the city of Chaska, and William Noll, seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of his constitutional rights to due process and equal protection of the laws and alleging negligent assault and battery. Jurisdiction is alleged under 28 U.S.C. § 1343(3) and (4) and pendent jurisdiction. This matter is presently before the court on the motion of Noll and the city of Chaska to dismiss.
Background
The following…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Baker v. McCollanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Larry T. Wilson, and Cross-Appellant v. Thomas L. Beebe, and Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1984
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- In Re Scott County Master DocketDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- Buranen v. HannaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1985
- Quaschnick v. MinnesotaDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1986