Legal Opinion
Buranen v. Hanna
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided December 5, 1985No. Civ. 4-85-321PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
MacLAUGHLIN, District Judge.
This matter is before the Court on the motions of defendants Hanna, Beltrand, and Therkelsen for dismissal for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted, 1 and in the alternative, for summary judgment based on collateral estoppel. The Court will deny defendants’ motion, but the Court will dismiss plaintiffs’ second cause of action.
FACTS
Plaintiffs in this action, Candace Lee Buranen and Robert Francis Buranen, are a wife and husband who assert that police officers unjustifiably arrested them and used excessive force in the…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Monroe v. PapeSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Maida v. AndrosDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1988