Legal Opinion

Emison v. J. Paul Sterns Co.

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 18, 1992No. CO-92-294PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

PETERSON, Judge.

Appellants challenge the trial court’s order granting respondent James W. Emi-son’s summary judgment motion, declaring appellants’ mechanics’ liens invalid, and dismissing appellant Laughlin Electric’s counterclaim against Emison and its third party action against Jane Emison. We affirm.

FACTS

James Emison contracted to have remodeling and renovation work done on his residence. One of the rooms to be remodeled was designated as an office and is the subject of this dispute. The office, which is only accessible from inside the house, is adjacent to the kitchen and across…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Dolder v. GriffinSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1982
  3. Korsunsky Krank Erickson Architects, Inc. v. WalshSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  4. Christle v. MarbergCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1988
  5. C. Kowalski, Inc. v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1991

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Wallboard, Inc. v. St. Cloud Mall, LLCCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API