Legal Opinion

Finn v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided May 19, 1932PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWait, J.

We find no error. The defendant contends that the trial judge should have directed a verdict in its favor on the ground that the plaintiff contributed to the injury and damage suffered by him through his own lack of due care.

It was undisputed that the plaintiff’s automobile was struck by a moving car of the defendant. The circumstances were disputed. There was evidence that the automobile had been parked about twelve feet from the defendant’s track in or near the driveway leading from the highway to a house where he had visited. To reach the travelled part of the highway the plaintiff must…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Jeddrey v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Pigeon v. Massachusetts Northeastern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Austin v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929
  4. Hatch v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1910
  5. Tognazzi v. Milford & Uxbridge Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Snow v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939
  2. Brown v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API