Legal Opinion

Newton v. Worcester Consolidated Street Railway Co.

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided December 16, 1930PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPierce, J.

This is an action of tort to recover for personal injuries and property damage growing out of a collision between an automobile operated by the plaintiff and a trolley car of the defendant at a point on Coburn Avenue, a public highway in the city of Worcester, where the defendant’s track, coming from a private way, crosses. At the close of all the evidence the defendant filed a motion for a directed verdict in its favor, and to the denial of this motion it duly exceptéd. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff. The judge reserved leave to enter a verdict for the defendant under G. L. c.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jeddrey v. Boston & Northern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1908
  2. Pigeon v. Massachusetts Northeastern Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918
  3. Walker v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1929

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Marturano v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1940
  2. Finn v. Eastern Massachusetts Street Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  3. Brown v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API