Legal Opinion

Williams v. Holsclaw

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided January 6, 1998No. COA96-1534PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARTIN, Mark D., Judge.

Plaintiffs appeal from orders granting summary judgment to defendants Ronald Holsclaw (Officer Holsclaw) and the City of Raleigh (collectively the municipal defendants) and dismissing unnamed defendant Integon Indemnity Corporation (Integon).

On 13 November 1994 plaintiff Michael Williams (Williams) was involved in an automobile accident with Officer Holsclaw, an on-duty City of Raleigh (City) police officer. Officer Holsclaw, while responding to a call, switched channels on his police radio to monitor the situation. After changing the channel, he saw Williams’ vehicle…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
  2. Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  3. State ex rel. Utilities Commission v. Lumbee River Electric Membership Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1969
  4. Taylor v. AshburnCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1993
  5. Silvers v. Horace Mann InsuranceSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1989

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. City of Jackson v. PerryMississippi Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Polaroid Corp. v. OffermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1998
  3. Schlossberg v. GoinsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  4. Borjas v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Clayton v. BransonCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API