People v. Mentch
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
WERDEGAR, J.
The Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (Act; Health & Saf. Code, § 11362.5, added by voter initiative, Prop. 215, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 5, 1996)) provides partial immunity for the possession and cultivation of marijuana to two groups of people; qualified medical marijuana patients and their primary caregivers. We consider here who may qualify as a primary caregiver. We hold that a defendant whose caregiving consisted principally of *278supplying marijuana and instructing on its use, and who • otherwise only sporadically took some patients to medical appointments, cannot qualify as a…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
- People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. MichaelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- Professional Engineers in California Government v. KemptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by49 opinions
- Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
- People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health & Wellness Center, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
- People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.