Legal Opinion

People v. Mentch

California Supreme Court

Decided November 24, 2008No. S148204PublishedCited by 49 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

WERDEGAR, J.

The Compassionate Use Act of 1996 (Act; Health & Saf. Code, § 11362.5, added by voter initiative, Prop. 215, Gen. Elec. (Nov. 5, 1996)) provides partial immunity for the possession and cultivation of marijuana to two groups of people; qualified medical marijuana patients and their primary caregivers. We consider here who may qualify as a primary caregiver. We hold that a defendant whose caregiving consisted principally of *278supplying marijuana and instructing on its use, and who • otherwise only sporadically took some patients to medical appointments, cannot qualify as a…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Legislature v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
  2. Elsner v. UvegesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  3. People v. MowerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  4. People v. MichaelsCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. Professional Engineers in California Government v. KemptonCalifornia Supreme Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by49 opinions

  1. Kwikset Corp. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2011
  2. People v. ValenciaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2017
  3. People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. City of Riverside v. Inland Empire Patients Health & Wellness Center, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2013
  5. People v. MitchellCalifornia Supreme Court · 2019

44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API