Shoe v. Heckley
Indiana Court of Appeals
From Wells Circuit Court; Frank W. Gordon, Judge. Action by Mary Shoe and others against Eugenia Heckley and others. From a judgment for defendants, the plaintiffs appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtNichols, J.
— This is a suit to quiet title, in second, third and fourth paragraphs of amended complaint.
It is averred in the second paragraph, in substance, that on and prior to February 8, 1901, one Martin Heckley was the owner in fee simple and in the possession of certain real estate in Wells county, Indiana. At said time and prior thereto the said Heckley and appellee Eugenia Heckley, hereinafter mentioned as appellee, were husband and wife, appellee being the second and childless wife. Appellants and appellee Frank Heckley, were the children 'of said Martin Heckley by a former marriage, and were…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Baldwin v. KerlinIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Baker v. PyattIndiana Supreme Court · 1886
- Duffield v. DuffieldIllinois Supreme Court · 1915
- Prior v. QuackenbushIndiana Supreme Court · 1868
- Outland v. BowenIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & PagosIndiana Supreme Court · 2008
- Gierhart v. Consolidated Rail Corp.-ConrailIndiana Court of Appeals · 1995
- Becker v. MacDonaldIndiana Court of Appeals · 1986
- Richardson v. RichardsonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1951
- Carlson v. Sweeney, Dabagia, Donoghue, Thorne, Janes & PagosIndiana Court of Appeals · 2007
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.