Legal Opinion

Prior v. Quackenbush

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1868PublishedCited by 32 opinions

APPEAL from the Greene Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Suit by the appellants, James Prior and Louisa Prior, his wife, against Quackenhush, for the partition of ten acres of land, and to recover the possession of a moiety thereof. Answer, the general denial. Trial by the court, resulting in a finding for the defendant. A motion for a new trial was overruled, and judgment for the defendant. The only cause stated for a new trial is that the finding of the court is contrary to the evidence. The error assigned is that the court erred in overruling the motion for a new trial.

The facts are these: The appellants,' in right of said Louisa, the wife, base…

2Cited by32 opinions

  1. Ridgeway v. LanphearIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  2. Tazian v. ClineIndiana Supreme Court · 1997
  3. Doren v. GillumIndiana Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Fountain County Coal & Mining Co. v. BeckleheimerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Beedy v. FinneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1902

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API