United Citizens v. Oregon Environmental Quality Commission
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, J.
Petitioners United Citizens, Daniel C. Phegley and Helen Osburn seek review of a circuit court decision affirming an order of the Environmental Quality Commission (EQC) under the Threat To Drinking Water Act, ORS 454.275 et seq (the Act), requiring that the cities of Portland and Gresham provide sewer service to “Mid-Multnomah County,” an unincorporated area between Portland and Gresham. EQC’s decision is an order in “other than a contested case.” ORS 183.484. The circuit court reviewed the order pursuant to ORS 183.484, for substantial evidence and errors of law. We review the circuit…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Monahan v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Foster v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1990
- Whitbeck v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1932
- Amalgamated Transit Union-Division 757 v. YerkovichCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
- Tillamook Peoples' Utility District v. CoatesOregon Supreme Court · 1944
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Keeton-King Construction Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
- Portello v. Oregon State System of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Teel Irrigation District v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- In Re Harris v. Oregon State Board of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- Teel Irrigation District v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995