Whitbeck v. Funk
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, C. J.
Plaintiff contends that Ordinance No. 61566 is a franchise ordinance and, therefore, comes within the provisions of section 173 of the charter, quoted above, and is subject to the referendum.
A franchise is a special privilege granted by the government to a person or corporation, which privilege does not belong to the citizens of a country generally, of common right: 26 C. J. 1008, § 1. A franchise confers the right to exercise powers or to do and perform acts which, without such grant, the person to whom it is granted could not do or perform: Oregon v. Portland General Electric Co., 52 Or.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Oregon v. Portland Gen. Elec. Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1908
- Monahan v. FunkOregon Supreme Court · 1931
- Campbell v. City of EugeneOregon Supreme Court · 1925
- Joplin v. Ten BrookOregon Supreme Court · 1928
- Roy v. BeveridgeOregon Supreme Court · 1928
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by22 opinions
- City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Kelley v. JohnNebraska Supreme Court · 1956
- Keigley v. Bench, City RecorderUtah Supreme Court · 1939
- City of Bowie v. County CommissionersCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1970
- Foster v. ClarkOregon Supreme Court · 1990
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.