Legal Opinion
Keeton-King Construction Inc. v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided December 26, 1990No. 88-CV-0392-WE; CA A61864PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.
Department of General Services (DGS) appeals the circuit court’s decision reversing its order in other than a contested case. ORS 183.484; ORS 183.500. We remand for reinstatement of the DGS order.
In 1988, DGS sought bids for construction of a building in Bend. On the first page of the bid invitation, DGS informed potential bidders that
“MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (MBE) AND WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (WBE) SUBCONTRACTING GOALS are a requirement of this contract. All information on goals established for this project, or, if a good faith effort was made and bidder failed to meet the goals,…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Blackman v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
- United Citizens v. Oregon Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3Cited by5 opinions
- Keeton-King Construction, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
- Norden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
- Portello v. Oregon State System of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
- Teel Irrigation District v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
- Teel Irrigation District v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995