Legal Opinion

Keeton-King Construction Inc. v. State

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided December 26, 1990No. 88-CV-0392-WE; CA A61864PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWarren, P. J.

Department of General Services (DGS) appeals the circuit court’s decision reversing its order in other than a contested case. ORS 183.484; ORS 183.500. We remand for reinstatement of the DGS order.

In 1988, DGS sought bids for construction of a building in Bend. On the first page of the bid invitation, DGS informed potential bidders that

“MINORITY BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (MBE) AND WOMEN BUSINESS ENTERPRISE (WBE) SUBCONTRACTING GOALS are a requirement of this contract. All information on goals established for this project, or, if a good faith effort was made and bidder failed to meet the goals,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Blackman v. Motor Vehicles DivisionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988
  2. United Citizens v. Oregon Environmental Quality CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Keeton-King Construction, Inc. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1991
  2. Norden v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1999
  3. Portello v. Oregon State System of Higher EducationCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1993
  4. Teel Irrigation District v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
  5. Teel Irrigation District v. Water Resources DepartmentCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API