Legal Opinion

In re the Will of Blumenthal

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided September 22, 1943PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Foley, S.

In this application for the construction of the will and for instructions as to the method of charging the Federal and State estate taxes, by my prior decision it was determined that all of the estate taxes must be prorated equitably against *139the testamentary beneficiaries other than the charities and against the donees by inter vivos transfers under the provisions of section 124 of the Decedent Estate Law. (Matter of Blumenthal, 180 Misc. 895.)

In the petition in the proceeding six different questions were originally presented for determination. The first and second were disposed of…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. In re the Estate of KaufmanNew York Surrogate's Court · 1939
  2. In re MatthewsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1938
  3. In Re the Accounting of TracyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904
  4. In Re the Estate of MatthewsNew York Court of Appeals · 1939
  5. In re the Estate of StarrNew York Surrogate's Court · 1935

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. Buckhantz v. DavidsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  2. In re the Construction of the Will of ShubertNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  3. In re the Construction of the Will of MattesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
  4. In re the Estate of BayneNew York Surrogate's Court · 1950
  5. Industrial Trust Co. v. BudlongSupreme Court of Rhode Island · 1950

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API