Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Bayne

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided December 26, 1950PublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Charles H. Griffiths, S.

In this accounting proceeding the executors seek a construction as to the effect of the following provision of the will with respect to the payment of taxes: “I further direct that all transfer, succession or inheritance taxes which may accrue hereunder in any jurisdiction be paid out of my general estate

The court determines that the foregoing provision relating to “ taxes which may accrue hereunder ” does not constitute a direction against the apportionment of estate taxes imposed against property passing outside the will. The mandate of the statute requiring a…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. In Re the Accounting of PhippsNew York Court of Appeals · 1948
  2. In re the Accounting of PhippsNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  3. In Re the Estate of DuryeaNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  4. In re the Estate of PetersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1949
  5. In re the Will of BlumenthalNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. In re the Construction of the Will of ShubertNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  2. Estate of McAuliffeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1955
  3. In re the Estate of OlsonNew York Surrogate's Court · 1974
  4. In re the Estate of ClineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1995
  5. Estate of NesbittCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1958

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API