Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Starr

New York Surrogate's Court

Decided October 7, 1935PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Delehanty, S.

On this accounting four questions are presented respecting the apportionment of Federal and New York State estate taxes.

*104Three require only brief comment. The tax on the value of the annuities must be paid in the first instance out of the fund set aside to produce them. The payment so made is to be reimbursed to the estate according to the rule in Matter of Tracy (179 N. Y. 501). The note appended to section 124 of the Decedent Estate Law when it was presented to the Legislature by the Commission to Investigate Defects in the Law of Estates makes it clear that the former rule…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. In Re the Accounting of TracyNew York Court of Appeals · 1904

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. In re the Accounting of PhippsNew York Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Buckhantz v. DavidsonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  3. In re the Construction of the Will of ShubertNew York Court of Appeals · 1962
  4. In re the Construction of the Will of MattesNew York Surrogate's Court · 1954
  5. In re the Will of BlumenthalNew York Surrogate's Court · 1943

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API