Legal Opinion

Smith v. Hines

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided December 11, 1920No. 22,739PublishedCited by 8 opinions

Appeal from Cowley district court; Oliver P. Fuller, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

*152The opinion of the court was delivered by.

Porter, J.:

H. H. Smith, while employed with a bridge gang on defendant’s railway, was seriously injured, and brought this action under the Federal employers’ liability act, both parties being engaged in interstate commerce at the time of the injury. The defense was that plaintiff had assumed the risk. The plaintiff prevailed and the defendant appeals.

Smith was a man of ordinary intelligence, 41 years of age, and a farmer; but he had some experience working as a carpenter with saw and hammer and had been employed with the bridge gang five or six weeks…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
  2. Tecza v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  3. King v. KingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1909
  4. McMullen v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1920
  5. Erwin v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1913

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Beal v. El Dorado Refining Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1931
  2. Fishburn v. International Harvester Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1943
  3. Miller v. Beech Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1969
  4. Smith v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Baltimore & Ohio Southwestern Railroad v. CarrollIndiana Supreme Court · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API