Erwin v. Missouri & Kansas Telephone Co.
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from Barry County Circuit Court.—Hon. Carr McNatt, Judge. (1) The equipment used was of the simplest kind and the dangers were obvious. Beckman v. Brewing Association, 98 Mo. App. 555. (2). Plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. Dodds v. Coke Co., 115 Mo. App. 501; Whaley v. Coleman, 113 Mo. App. 598; Knorpp v. Wagner, 195 Mo. 637; Myers v. Glass Co., 127 Mo. App. 557; Schiller v. Breweries Co., 156 Mo.
Read the full summary
Appeal from Barry County Circuit Court.—Hon. Carr McNatt, Judge. (1) The equipment used was of the simplest kind and the dangers were obvious. Beckman v. Brewing Association, 98 Mo. App. 555. (2). Plaintiff was guilty of contributory negligence. Dodds v. Coke Co., 115 Mo. App. 501; Whaley v. Coleman, 113 Mo. App. 598; Knorpp v. Wagner, 195 Mo. 637; Myers v. Glass Co., 127 Mo. App. 557; Schiller v. Breweries Co., 156 Mo. App. 569. (3) An employer may conduct his own business in his own way, if that way is not unlawful. Letanovsky v. Shoe Co., 157 Mo. App. 120; Schiller v. Breweries Co., 156…
1Opinion of the Court
CHARLES L. HENSON, Special Judge.
—Judge Farrington, having been of counsel in this cause, disqualified, and it was argued and submitted to Presiding Judge Robertson and Judge Sturgis. They were unable to agree upon the disposition to be made of the *516cause, whereupon Charles L. Henson, of Mount Vernon, was agreed upon and chosen as special judge herein. The cause was then reargued, and submitted to the court as thus constituted.
ON THE MOTION TO AFPIEM THE JUDGMENT.. 1. We are confronted, at the very outset, with respondent’s motion to affirm the judgment, because of appellant’s failure to file,…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Curtis v. McNairSupreme Court of Missouri · 1903
- Bradley v. Chicago, Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1897
- Jewell v. Kansas City Bolt & Nut Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1910
- Blundell v. Wm. A. Miller Elevator Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1905
- Charlton v. St. Louis & San Francisco RailroadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1906
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Bullock v. B. R. Electric Supply Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1933
- Smith v. HinesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1920
- Broyles Ex Rel. Broyles v. State Highway CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1928
- Morgan v. Sunflower Zinc Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1917
- Chicago, Indianapolis and Louisville Railway Co. v. YoungerIndiana Court of Appeals · 1931
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.