Legal Opinion

King v. King

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided March 6, 1909No. 15,690PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error from Reno district court; Peter J. Galle, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Mason, J.:

While Hayden King was operating a circular saw, used for trimming the edges of boards in a factory belonging to H. King, his left hand came in contact with it, severing a part of the thumb and three fingers. He brought an action against the owner claiming damages on the ground that the machinery was defective, and recovered a judgment, from which the defendant prosecutes error.

In describing his injury in his petition the plaintiff used the words employed in the foregoing statement. Complaint is made because in his testimony he was not…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Anderson v. FieldingSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1904
  2. Olmscheid v. Nelson-Tenney Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1896

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Tecza v. Sulzberger & Sons Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  2. Every v. RainsSupreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  3. Smith v. Massey-Ferguson, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  4. Ahlstrom v. Kansas Milling Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1911
  5. Carillo v. United States Construction & Finance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1910

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API