Legal Opinion

Unger v. Continental Assurance Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided July 17, 1985No. 60123PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moran

Plaintiff, John W. Unger, M.D., filed a complaint in the circuit court of Cook County, setting forth a common law medical malpractice claim against defendant Carl R. Hines, M.D., and defendant Continental Assurance Company (CAC), the alleged employer of Hines. Plaintiff filed an amended complaint in which he added Continental Casualty Company (CCC) as a defendant, maintaining that he and Dr. Hines were employed by both CAC and CCC. The trial court ordered that plaintiffs amended complaint be stricken and CCC dismissed as a defendant, finding that plaintiffs failure to name CCC as a defendant,…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Botwinick v. OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  3. Smith v. Metropolitan Sanitary District of Greater ChicagoIllinois Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Sjostrom v. SprouleIllinois Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Garcia v. IsersonNew York Court of Appeals · 1974

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Paganelis v. Industrial CommissionIllinois Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Darensburg v. Tobey, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1994
  3. Wilfert v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Mabie v. Village of SchaumburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 2006
  5. Folta v. Ferro EngineeringIllinois Supreme Court · 2015

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API