Legal Opinion

Mabie v. Village of Schaumburg

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided March 31, 2006No. 1-05-2457PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wolfson

Daniel Mabie, a fireman, sues the Village of Schaumburg (the Village) for sick leave and vacation benefits he did not receive while recovering from injuries incurred at the fire station. He says he is entitled to those benefits under the Public Employee Disability Act (PEDA) (5 ILCS 345/0.01 et seq. (West 2000)).

The Village claims it does not have to pay the benefits because the plaintiffs injury did not occur “in the line of duty” under PEDA.

This case requires us to construe and apply PEDA’s use of the words “line of duty.” The trial court granted summary judgment to the plaintiff. We affirm…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Chmelik v. VanaIllinois Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Dowrick v. Village of Downers GroveAppellate Court of Illinois · 2005
  3. Wilfert v. Retirement Board of the Firemen's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. Luchesi v. Retirement Board of Firemen's AnnuityAppellate Court of Illinois · 2002
  5. Unger v. Continental Assurance Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1985

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Pederson v. Village of Hoffman EstatesAppellate Court of Illinois · 2014
  2. Richter v. Village of Oak BrookAppellate Court of Illinois · 2011
  3. Reed v. Retirement Board of Fireman's Annuity & Benefit FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2007
  4. Pekin Insurance Co. v. St. Paul Lutheran ChurchAppellate Court of Illinois · 2017
  5. Prawdzik v. Board of Trustees of the Homer Township Fire Protection District Pension FundAppellate Court of Illinois · 2019

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API