Legal Opinion

Garcia v. Iserson

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 22, 1974PublishedCited by 57 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJones, J.

We hold that the claim of an employee for alleged malpractice of a physician whose professional services were *423made available to the employee at the employer’s expense and on its premises fall here within the scope of the Workmen’s Compensation Law.

Plaintiff, an employee of Imperial Paper Box Corporation, was treated in an infirmary on the employer’s premises by Dr. Iserson who allegedly gave him an injection in a negligent manner, causing the injuries of which he complains. Dr. Iserson • had been employed by Imperial at a weekly salary of $100 to give medical care to employees of Imperial.…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Volk v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1940

3Cited by57 opinions

  1. Botwinick v. OgdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
  2. Budzichowski v. Bell Tel. Co. of Pa.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  3. D'Angona v. County of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Panaro v. Electrolux Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  5. Deller v. NaymickWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1986

52 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API