Legal Opinion

Johnson v. M. J. O'neil, Inc.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided January 2, 1931No. 28,226PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtOlsen, J.

Defendant appeals from an order denying its alternative motion for judgment or a new trial.

Defendant had the contract for furnishing, installing and erecting all piping, wiring, and auxiliary equipment, together with all labor and material required, for the construction of a complete boiler plant for the municipal power plant at Austin, Minnesota. A new building had been or was being constructed joining an older power plant building. Plans and specifications for the work to be done and materials and equipment to be furnished had been prepared by Toltz, King & Day, architects and engineers.…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Minneapolis & St. Louis Railway v. Columbus Rolling MillSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Hankins v. YoungSupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  3. Kileen v. KennedySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1903
  4. Midland National Bank v. Security Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1924
  5. Manufacturers & Merchants Inspection Bureau v. Everwear Hosiery Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1913

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Minnesota Supply Co. v. Raymond Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. Farmers State Bank v. Sig Ellingson & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  3. Griggs v. OakNebraska Supreme Court · 1957
  4. Henry Simons Lumber Co. v. SimonsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1950
  5. Podany v. EricksonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API