People v. Norrell
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOSK, J.
Penal Code section 654 requires that “[a]n act or omission which is made punishable in different ways by different provisions of this *3code may be punished under either of such provisions, but in no case can it be punished under more than one . . . We have long held that this provision bars multiple punishment when a defendant is convicted of two or more offenses that are incident to one objective. (Neal v. State of California (1960) 55 Cal.2d 11 [9 Cal.Rptr. 607, 357 P.2d 839]; People v. Latimer (1993) 5 Cal.4th 1203 [23 Cal.Rptr.2d 144, 858 P.2d 611] [reaffirming Neal].) In…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Neal v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1960
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. HoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- People v. McFarlandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- People v. LatimerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- People v. DelozaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1998
- People v. AlfordCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- People v. StatumCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
- People v. ClevelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.