Legal Opinion

Carr v. . Bizzell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 29, 1926PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Stacy, O. J.

The exceptions addressed to the admission and exclusion of evidence, call for no particular elaboration. They are without substantial merit and cannot be sustained.

The ones mainly stressed on the argument relate to the admission of declarations against interest, made by owners of the land, under whom the defendant claims, while they, the declarants, were in possession of the premises asserting ownership thereof.

It appears that the declarations, quoted by the witnesses, were made before any dispute arose over the boundary line; that they were against the pecuniary or proprietary…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Smith v. Moore.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  3. Hill v. Dalton.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1905
  4. Woody v. Fountain.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Garris v. . HarringtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1914

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Wilson County Board of Education v. LammSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1970
  2. Virginia-Carolina Power Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1927
  3. Plemmons v. CutshallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Boone v. . CollinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  5. Hager v. . WhitenerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API