Legal Opinion

Hager v. . Whitener

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 14, 1933PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClarkson, J.

We think that plaintiff’s evidence was sufficient to sustain the allegations in the pleadings. Defendant’s intestate, James L. Hager, was a bachelor and an old man when he died. The testimony of J. B. Readling was to the effect that the relationship between plaintiff, Jas. L. Hager and John D. Hager “Was like unto p'arent and child.” F. O. Sherrill testified, in part as to statements made by Jas. L. Hager in reference to John D. Hager: “He has agreed to live with me and take care of me and I am to give him what property I have got.” Bob Alley testified, in part: “I am getting old and feeble…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Smith v. Moore.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Carpenter v. Asheville Power & Light Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1926
  3. Brown v. . WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1928
  4. Bowling v. Bowling's AdministratorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1927
  5. Roe v. . JourneganSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1918

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. CookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
  2. Grantham v. . GranthamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  3. Peek v. ShookSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1951
  4. Price v. . AskinsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1937
  5. Pickelsimer Ex Rel. Gash v. PickelsimerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API