Legal Opinion

Junge v. Jerzak

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1994No. 18362, 18365PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*30WUEST, Justice.

Defendants John Jerzak and the P.J. McLaughlin Company (hereinafter Jerzak) appeal the circuit court’s order granting plaintiffs’ LaVonne and Hiene Junge (hereinafter Junge) a new trial. We affirm.

FACTS

On October 3, 1990, Jerzak was driving his employer’s pickup truck east on Seventh Av- • enue Southwest in Watertown, South Dakota. Jerzak stopped in the traffic lane, put his track into reverse and backed up, apparently to position his vehicle so as to maneuver the pickup truck into a parallel parking space. At approximately the same time, Junge was preparing to turn east onto…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Dartt v. BerghorstSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. Degen v. BaymanSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
  3. Case v. MurdockSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  4. Starnes v. StofferahnSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1968
  5. In Re Estate of SmithSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1987

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Veeder v. KennedySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Schuldies v. MillarSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  3. LDL Cattle Co., Inc. v. GuetterSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
  4. Rogen v. MonsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Gilkyson v. Wheelchair Express, Inc.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1998

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API