Legal Opinion
Rogen v. Monson
South Dakota Supreme Court
Decided April 19, 2000No. NonePublishedCited by 31 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMUNDSON, Justice.
[¶ 1.] Beverly and Alton Rogen (Rogens) appeal the denial of their motion for new trial and additur on the grounds that insufficient evidence existed for the jury verdict of $4,800 and claim error in admission of expert testimony. We affirm.
FACTS
[¶ 2.] On October 15, 1995, Lezli Monson (Monson) was driving on 1-90 in Pennington County, South Dakota. Monson was following a vehicle driven by sixty-four-year-old Beverly Rogen (Beverly). Beverly’s husband Alton (Alton) was a passenger in the vehicle. Both automobiles eventually exited the interstate. As the cars approached the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- State v. NelsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1998
- Johnson v. John Deere Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1981
- Kuper v. Lincoln-Union Electric Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1996
- Gross v. Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by31 opinions
- State v. GuthrieSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2001
- Kostel v. SchwartzSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- In Re South Dakota Microsoft Antitrust LitigationSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003
- Baddou v. HallSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. JensenSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 2007
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.