Legal Opinion

Duluth National Bank v. Knoxville Fire Insurance

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided September 29, 1886PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from the Chancery Court of Knox County. January Term, 1886. W. B. Staley, Ch.

1Opinion of the CourtBurton, J.

The bill in this cause was filed, by the Duluth National Bank against the Knoxville Eire Insurance Company on a policy for $1,000 issued by said insurance company to the Oneceta Lumber Company, of Oneœta, Minnesota. The policy, upon its face, is made payable, in case of loss, “to the Duluth National Bank as their interest may appear.” The insurance was upon lumber, and the property insured was destroyed by fire, and this action is to recover, under the policy, for said loss. The Oneceta Lumber Company, the party assured, is not before the Court either as complainant or defendant.

Complainants…

2Cited by14 opinions

  1. Indiana Insurance v. HartwellIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  2. Maryland Casualty Co. v. McTyierTennessee Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Merchants' Planters' Ins. Co. v. MarshSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
  4. Springfield Fire Insurance v. PriceSupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
  5. Bradshaw v. VanValkenburgTennessee Supreme Court · 1896

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API