Bradshaw v. VanValkenburg
Tennessee Supreme Court
FROM HAMILTON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Hamilton County. T. M. McConnell, Ch.
1Opinion of the CourtWiLKES, J.
This bill was filed by Bradshaw and wife to enjoin the immediate sale of land under a *318deed of trust executed by them, and to have an account of usury involved in the transaction. To it, as originally filed, VanValkenburg, the trustee, and the Georgia Loan & Trust Co., were made parties. They filed answers and denied the usury, and stated that the money was really loaned by one Wakeman, for whom the trustee and the Georgia company acted as agent. Complainants thereupon filed a supplemental bill, stating that they did not know Wake-man in the transaction, and he is asked to be made a party and…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Duluth National Bank v. Knoxville Fire InsuranceTennessee Supreme Court · 1886
3Cited by18 opinions
- Peek v. Wachovia Bank & Trust CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1955
- Hamilton v. FowlerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1899
- Smith v. CrossTennessee Supreme Court · 1911
- Baker v. ButcherCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1930
- Russell v. ZanoneCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1966
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.