Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Manners

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided June 27, 1984No. 83-260; CA A29397PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Wife raises three assignments of error against a decree of dissolution: (1) The trial court erred in failing to allow her a share of husband’s military pension; (2) the court erred in its award of spousal support; and (3) the court erred in failing to require husband to maintain life insurance in wife’s favor. We modify the decree to allow wife a share of the pension.

Husband and wife married in November, 1964. At the time of trial, husband was 40 and wife was 42. They have one child, age 17. Husband enlisted in the Coast Guard August 20, 1962, and has served continuously ever since. He has…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Matter of Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  4. In re the Marriage of RogersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  5. Matter of Marriage of WoodCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Matter of Marriage of RichardsonOregon Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Butcher v. ButcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  3. Moore v. MooreSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1989
  4. Manners v. Manners (In Re Manners)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Montana · 1986
  5. In the Matter of Marriage of Crislip and CrislipCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1987

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API