Legal Opinion
Moore v. Moore
Supreme Court of New Jersey
Decided February 15, 1989PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
GARIBALDI, J.
We hold today that the right to receive future post-retirement cost-of-living increases payable to pensioners under the New Jersey Police and Firemen’s Retirement system (NJPFRS) qualifies as marital property subject to equitable distribution. The extent of inclusion of such post-retirement cost-of-living increases is limited to those attributable to the portion of the pension that was earned during the marriage.
Calvin Moore and Barbara Moore were married in December of 1961. Mr. Moore became a policeman in the City of Newark in March of…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Rothman v. RothmanSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1974
- Stern v. SternSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1975
- Dugan v. DuganSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1983
- Kruger v. KrugerSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1977
- In Re Marriage of SheldonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Innes v. InnesSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1990
- Bender v. BenderSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2001
- Bornemann v. BornemannSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- In Re the Marriage of HuntSupreme Court of Colorado · 1995
- Dobin v. Hill (In Re Hill)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.