Legal Opinion

Matter of Marriage of Wood

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided February 8, 1984No. 15-82-05405; CA A28042PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Husband appeals from a decree of dissolution on the ground that the trial court incorrectly included his military pension in the division of marital property. We affirm.

At the time of the dissolution, the parties had been married approximately 13 years, the first eight years and three months of which husband served in the Navy. He retired in 1978, ending a 19-year and three-month career. Their assets, valued at approximately $14,000, consisted of a house and items of personal property. In addition, husband receives monthly military pension payments of $600. Husband was awarded roughly $9,500…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. McCarty v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  2. Matter of Marriage of VinsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  3. In re the Marriage of SmedleyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1982
  4. In re the Marriage of WallaceCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1983

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. In Re Marriage of GalloSupreme Court of Colorado · 1988
  2. In Re the Marriage of KonzenWashington Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Butcher v. ButcherWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1987
  4. Ziegler v. ZieglerIdaho Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Matter of Marriage of MannersCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API