Legal Opinion
Beswick v. City of Philadelphia
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 6, 2001No. 00-1304PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
GILES, Chief Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Ralph Raymond Beswick, Jr. and Rose Wiegand, Co-Administrators of the Estate of Ralph Richard Beswick, Sr., bring a constitutional claim pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 against the City of Philadelphia (“City”) and its former 911 call-taker, Julie Rodriguez, and, asserting pendent jurisdiction, bring state law negligence claims against Julie Rodriguez, and Father and Son Transport Leasing Inc., d/b/a CareStat Ambulance and Invalid Coach Transportation, Inc. (“CareStat”), a private ambulance service, its record owner, Slawomir Cieloszcyk, a purported…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- City of Oklahoma v. TuttleSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- In Re Paoli Railroad Yard PCB LitigationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1994
- Hamil v. BashlineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Arista v. Cnty. of Riverside, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Turner v. BarnhartDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2003
- Alfrey v. WhitleyDistrict Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2024
- Arista v. Cnty. of Riverside, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2018
- Arista v. County of RiversideCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.