Legal Opinion
Arista v. Cnty. of Riverside
California Court of Appeal, 5th District
Decided November 20, 2018No. E068432PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER J.
*1054In a second amended complaint (SAC), Christyna Arista (Wife), Andres Marin-Arista, Jazmyn Nicole Marin-Arista, Christal Marin Arista, and Julyan Marin Arista sued the County of Riverside (the County) for (1) wrongful death, (2) negligence, (3) negligent infliction of emotional distress, and (4) a deprivation of constitutional rights ( 42 U.S.C. § 1983 ). The trial court sustained the County's demurrer to the SAC without leave to amend. Wife, Andres, Jazmyn, Christal, and Julyan (collectively, the Family) contend the trial court erred. We reverse in part, and affirm in part.
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Norgart v. Upjohn Co.California Supreme Court · 1999
- Aubry v. Tri-City Hospital DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Williams v. State of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Burgess v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Arista v. County of Riverside CA4/2California Court of Appeal · 2021
- Hendrix v. City of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- The Folb Partnership v. City of Los Angeles CA2/7California Court of Appeal · 2020