Legal Opinion

Ziolkowski v. Continental Casualty Co.

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 7, 1936No. Gen. No. 38,397PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Mr. Presiding Justice Scanlan

delivered the opinion of the court.

Plaintiff sued defendant in assumpsit as beneficiary under an accident insurance policy issued by defendant to one Joseph Sarnouski. The case was tried by the court, the issues were found for plaintiff, and damages were assessed in the sum of $2,979. Defendant appeals from a judgment entered upon the finding.

This was the third trial of the cause. In the first there was a finding and judgment in favor of plaintiff, and upon appeal we reversed the judgment and remanded the cause because of the refusal of the trial court to admit…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. American Accident Co. v. CarsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1896
  2. Olson v. Southern Surety Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1926
  3. Hessler v. Federal Casualty Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1921
  4. Provident Life & Accident Ins. Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  5. Interstate Business Men's Accident Ass'n v. DunnCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Horace Mann Insurance Co. v. Independent School District No. 656Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1984
  2. Ziolkowski v. Continental Casualty Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1937
  3. E. J. Albrecht Co. v. Fidelity & Casualty Co. of New YorkAppellate Court of Illinois · 1937
  4. Mid-Century Insurance v. HauckCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1973

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API