Legal Opinion
Olson v. Southern Surety Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Decided April 9, 1926PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMorling, J.
I. In the application for the policy, the in sured answered “yes” to the question, “Are your habits of life correct and temperate?” The insured answered “yes” also to the question:
“Do you understand and agree that, as * * * the above representations are made to in-(juee issliance ,0f an insurance policy, should one or more * * # prove to be false, all right to recovery * * * shall be voided * * * if such false answer were made with actual intent to deceive or materially affect the acceptance of the risk or the hazard * * * ”
The defendant pleaded that the representation was false, and so known…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- See v. North American Accident InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
- Jones v. United States Mutual Accident Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Ley v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Union Accident Co. v. WillisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- Jordan v. Iowa Mutual Tornado InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1911
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Shepherd v. Midland Mutual Life Ins.Ohio Supreme Court · 1949
- Brammer v. Allied Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1970
- Hebert Ex Rel. Hebert v. AllenSupreme Court of Iowa · 1950
- Lumbermens Mutual Insurance Co., Mansfield v. Blackburn Ex Rel. BlackburnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
- Roach v. ChurchmanCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1970
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.